10.17843/rpmesp.2020.372.4829

BRIEF REPORT

 

Presence of fimH and afa genes in urinary isolates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producing Escherichia coli in Lima, Peru

 

Jose Matta-Chuquisapon 1, Medical Technologist
Esther Valencia-Bazalar 1,
Medical Technologist
Luis Marocho-Chahuayo 2,
Physician specialized in Infectious and Tropical Diseases
Edgar Gonzales-Escalante 3,4,
Medical Technologist, Master in Microbiology
Carlos Raúl Sevilla-Andrade 3,5,
Medical Technologist

1 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.
2 Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño, Lima, Perú.
3 Centro de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Biomédicas y Medioambientales (CITBM), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.
4 Laboratorio de Resistencia Bacteriana, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
5 Grupo de Investigación en Resistencia a los antimicrobianos (MICRESIS), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.

This study is part of Matta Chuquisapon J.’ s undergraduate thesis: Frequency of fimH and afa genes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producing Escherichia coli isolated from urine cultures, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, presented in 2018 in Lima.

 


ABSTRACT

Descriptive study conducted in order to determine the presence of the fimH and afa genes in urinary isolates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli. Isolates from project TO-06/09 of the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño in Lima, Peru were used. A total of 75 urinary isolates of Escherichia coli were included. Gene identification was performed by polymerase chain reaction. From the 75 isolates, 74 (98.7%) were positive for the fimH gene and 6 (8.0%) were positive for the afa gene. Virulence factors produced by the fimH and afa genes were evident in urinary isolates of ESBL producing Escherichia coli.

Keywords: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli; Virulence Factors; beta-Lactamases; Peru (source: MeSH NLM).

 


INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children can affect both the upper and lower urinary tract, causing several urinary disorders, such as cystitis and pyelonephritis. During childhood, approximately 6% to 8% of pediatric patients with urinary symptoms have a UTI (1,2). Frequency varies according to several factors, such as age and gender. It is more common in girls and uncircumcised boys. UTIs in children with urinary tract abnormalities such as neurogenic bladder or vesicoureteral reflux may result in irreversible kidney damage (3,4).

UTIs are caused by a group of microorganisms known as uropathogens, which can minimize the host’s immune response and invade the urinary system with uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), causing 85% of episodes of acute cystitis in humans. This pathotype has virulence factors that allow it to adhere to and invade tissues, besides, these factors determine the capacity for infection, chronicity, recurrence and the possibility of dissemination to other tissues (5,6).

Among the most frequent virulence factors of UPEC are fimbriae (P and type 1); adhesins, such as fimH, S, M FIC, Dr/afa, Sfa; and systems for the uptake of iron (aerobactins), alpha‑hemolysin and other enzymes with protease activity (5). fimH adhesin is present in more than 80% of Escherichia coli strains that cause UTIs. This adhesin is responsible for generating the adhesion of the bacteria to the urinary tissue, thus favoring colonization and subsequent invasion of the urothelium (6). afa adhesin appears in no more than 40% of UPEC but is a key element in the development of infections in children and pregnant women because of its ability to cause complications (7). In addition, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of UPECs need to be constantly updated to provide adequate empirical treatment for urinary tract infections, as these may vary according to origin, geographical region or institution (8).

The main mechanism of resistance to beta-lactams in enterobacteria is the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). Since ESBL have the capacity to hydrolyze most of the beta-lactams (except carbapenemics and cephamycins), it is a pattern of multi-resistance, which causes a serious therapeutic problem. This explains its association with higher mortality, hospital stay and increased economic cost (9). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the presence of the fimH and afa genes in urinary isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.

 

KEY MESSAGES

Motivation for the study: Adhesins (such as fimH and afa) are responsible for the colonization, invasion and chronicity of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infections.

Main findings: In urinary isolates of ESBL‑producing Escherichia coli, the fimH gene was present in 98.7%, and the afa gene, in 8.0% of the samples.

Implications: The presence of fimH and afa in isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from pediatric patients could indicate a relationship between adhesins and age group. A possible relationship was found between being not sensitive to amikacin and the afa gene.

 

THE STUDY

A descriptive study conducted to evaluate urinary isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (the bacteria were collected between August 2012 and January 2013) from the strain obtained from project TO-06/09 of the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño (Molecular detection and characterization of extended-spectrum beta lactamases in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño). A total of 75 consecutive non-repeated isolates were recovered from urine samples from pediatric patients in the inpatient and outpatient departments.

Molecular detection was performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Genetics of the Instituto de Medicina Tropical Daniel A. Carrión - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM). Total DNA was used as a mold. The fimH gene was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method according to Tolentino’s protocol (10). For the afa gene, a protocol was standardized in this study considering the concentration of primers, Taq polymerase DNA, hybridization temperature and mold DNA concentration.

IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to report absolute and relative frequencies for the variables of interest that were obtained from the strain database.

The study protocol was approved by the UNMSM School of Medical Technology. The study follows the good practice and ethics in biomedical research guidelines.

RESULTS

Out of the 75 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from urine cultures, 74 (98.7%) were positive for the fimH gene, and 6 (8.0%) were positive for the afa gene. In the descriptive analysis of the variables (Table 1), the frequency of fimH gene-producing Escherichia coli according to its origin was 31.1% in a hospital setting and 68.9% in the community. For the afa gene, the frequency was 16.7% in a hospital setting and 83.3% in the community. Out of the total number of isolations, 54 (72%) were female and the median age was 3 years. No link was found between the virulence genes and the gender, age and location variables. The antibiotic susceptibility profile from ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates is shown in Figure 2. The relationship between the presence of virulence genes and non-sensitivity to antibiotics was evaluated. An association was found between non-sensitivity to amikacin and the presence of the afa gene (Table 2).

 

Table 1. General distribution of Escherichia coli virulence genes.

Characteristics

afa gene

fimH gene

Yes (%)

No (%)

Yes (%)

No (%)

Gender

 

 

 

 

Male

2 (9.5)

90 (90.5)

21 (100)

-

Female

4 (7.4)

50 (92.6)

53 (98.2)

1 (1.8)

Age (years)

-

 

 

 

<1

1 (5.0)

19 (95.0)

20 (100)

-

1

1 (7.7)

12 (92.3)

13 (100)

-

2

-

3 (100)

3 (100)

-

3

1 (16.7)

5 (83.3)

5 (83.3)

1 (16.7)

4

1 (20.0)

4 (80.0)

5 (100)

-

6

-

6 (100)

6 (100)

-

7

-

7 (100)

7 (100)

-

8

2 (40.0)

3 (60.0)

5 (100)

-

9

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

11

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

12

-

2 (100)

2 (100)

-

13

-

5 (100)

5 (100)

-

14

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

Localization

 

 

 

 

Community

 

 

 

 

Outpatient

4 (9.1)

40 (90.9)

44 (100)

-

Emergency

1 (12.5)

7 (87.5)

7 (87.5)

1 (12.5)

Hospital

 

 

 

 

Internal medicine

-

5 (100)

5 (100)

-

Neonatology ICU

-

4 (100)

4 (100)

-

Orthopedics

-

2 (100)

2 (100)

-

Pneumology

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

ICU

-

2 (100)

2 (100)

-

Neurology

-

2 (100)

2 (100)

-

Nephrology

-

2 (100)

2 (100)

-

Cardiology

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

2 (100)

-

Surgery

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

Urology

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

Gynecology

-

1 (100)

1 (100)

-

ICU: Intensive Care Unit

 

Table 2. Virulence genes according to antibiotic susceptibility

Antibiotics

afa gene

fimH gene

Yes (%)

No (%)

Yes (%)

No (%)

Amikacin

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

3 (33.3)

6 (66.7) *

9 (100)

-

Sensible

3 (4.5)

63 (95.5)

65 (98.5)

1 (1.5)

Gentamicin

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

3 (6.7)

42 (93.3)

45 (100)

-

Sensible

3 (10.0)

27 (90.0)

29 (96.7)

1 (3.3)

Ciprofloxacin

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

6 (8.8)

62 (91.2)

67 (98.5)

1 (1.5)

Sensible

-

7 (100)

7 (100)

 

Imipenem

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

-

-

-

-

Sensible

6 (8.0)

69 (92.0)

74 (98.7)

1 (1.3)

Meropenem

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

-

-

-

-

Sensible

6 (8.0)

69 (92.0)

74 (98.7)

1 (1.3)

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

5 (9.3)

49 (90.7)

53 (98.5)

-

Sensible

1 (4.8)

20 (95.2)

21 (100)

-

Nitrofurantoin

 

 

 

 

Not sensible

1 (14.3)

6 (85.7)

7 (100)

-

Sensible

5 (7.4)

63 (92.6)

67 (98.5)

1 (1.5)

*p-value < 0.05 with Chi-square test

 

Figure 2. Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates (n=75). R: resistant; I: intermediate; S: susceptible; IMP: imipenem; MEM: meropenem; NITRO: nitrofurantoin; AK: amikacin; CN: gentamicin; SXT: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim; CIP: ciprofloxacin.

 

In the PCR standardization for the afa gene, temperature gradient was performed and the best hybridization temperature was obtained at 62 °C, with a minimum concentration of primers at 1 μM, and of Taq polymerase DNA at 0.5 U/rx. The minimum concentration of DNA detectable by the test was 400 pg/dL (Figure 1).

  

Figure 1. Standardization of the DNA polymerase chain reaction for the afa gene in a 2% ladder agarose gel of 100 bp. A. Concentration gradient to evaluate the PCR sensitivity for the afa gene (molecular weight of the afa gene 750 bp). The minimum concentration detected was 400 pg. B. Temperature gradient for the standardization of the hybridization temperature. C. Simultaneous standardization of the concentration of primers and Taq polymerase DNA. It was concluded that the optimal concentration of primers is 0.1 μM with 0.5 IU Taq concentration.

 

DISCUSSION

The results of this study show that 98.7% of ESBL‑producing Escherichia coli isolates recovered from a pediatric population presented the fimH gene. This finding is similar to that reported by Kim, et al. (11), who observed the presence of fimH adhesin in the total number of Escherichia coli isolates from pediatric urine cultures and found a relationship between this adhesin and the phylogroups B2 and D. Likewise, Tabasi, et al. (12) found, after studying isolates from adult patients with UTIs, that 100% of Escherichia coli isolates carried the fimH gene from isolates of UTI patients in the adult population. Similarly, Rahdar, et al. (13) detected the fimH gene in 95% of UPEC isolates and found no relationship between the presence of the fimH gene and Escherichia coli phylogroups. In 2009, Berry, et al. described the mechanism of action for fimH adhesin, which acts and interacts with urothelium, allowing UPEC to enter and form intracellular bacterial colonies (IBC) after the first 6 hours of infection (14). IBCs are responsible for the recurrence, chronicity, and formation of bacterial reservoirs in the urothelium (15).

Regarding the afa gene, we reported a frequency of 8.0% in the studied UPEC; this is consistent with the findings of Ramirez (16), who reported a frequency of 8.2% of the afa gene in multiresistant UPEC strains. In contrast, Tabasi, et al. (12), reported a frequency of 29.5% for the afa gene, and a relationship between cystitis and recurrent infections with the presence of the afa gene. On the other hand, Servin considers that the presence of the afa gene (subtype afaE) is more frequent in Escherichia coli that causes pyelonephritis (7). Tajbakhsh, et al. reported that 32% of UPEC isolates had the afa gene, and found a significant association between the presence of afa and biofilm production (p<0.05), a characteristic that was also associated with the presence of beta-lactamases (17).

In 2017 Souza, et al. reported a 9% frequency of the afa gene in UPEC isolates (18) but found no significant association between the gene and the phylogroup, nor with the gender of the patient from which it was isolated. Furthermore, they showed that the presence of the afa gene and being not sensitive to amikacin were significantly associated. Which differs from what was reported by Malekzadegan, et al. (19), who found no association between the afa gene and no being sensitive to amikacin, but did find an association between the presence of the afa gene and the production of ESBL.

The study has some limitations that are relevant to address. The results obtained correspond to a single center, which could differ according to each population and institution. Furthermore, no other virulence factors of importance in the pediatric population were sought, nor their possible relationship with resistance markers.

In conclusion, the presence of virulence factors produced by the genes fimH and afa was evidenced in urinary isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. Besides, the standardization and optimization of PCR for the detection of the afa gene performed satisfactorily.

Acknowledgements: To the staff of the Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Genetics of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos for their continued support.

 

REFERENCES

1. Kaufman J, Temple-Smith M, Sanci L. Urinary tract infections in children: an overview of diagnosis and management. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3(1):e000487. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000487.

2. Leung AKC, Wong AHC, Leung AAM, Hon KL. Urinary Tract Infection in Children. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2019;13(1):2-18. doi: 10.2174/1872213X13666181228154940.

3. Tullus K. Fifteen-minute consultation: ¿Why and how do children get urinary tract infections?. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2019;104(5):244-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315023.

4. Asociación Española de Pediatría. Protocolos diagnósticos y terapéuticos en Pediatría: Infectología pediátrica [Internet]. España: ERGON; 2011[citado el 13 de marzo de 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.aeped.es/documentos/protocolos-infectologia-en-revision.

5. Terlizzi ME, Gribaudo G, Maffei ME. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) Infections: Virulence Factors, Bladder Responses, Antibiotic, and Non-antibiotic Antimicrobial Strategies. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01566.

6. Najafi A, Hasanpour M, Askary A, Aziemzadeh M, Hashemi N. Distribution of pathogenicity island markers and virulence factors in new phylogenetic groups of 57 uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2018;63(3):335- 43. doi: 10.1007/s12223-017-0570-3.

7. Servin AL. Pathogenesis of human diffusely adhering Escherichia coli expressing Afa/Dr adhesins (Afa/Dr DAEC): current insights and future challenges. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(4):823-69. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00036-14.

8. Warren J, Abrutyn E, Hebel J, Johnson J, Schaeffer A, Stamm W. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(4):745-58. doi: 10.1086/520427.

9. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol. 2005;18(4):657-86. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.2005.

10. Tolentino E. Detección genotípica de los factores de virulencia: Fimbria tipo 1, Fimbria P y alfa hemolisina en Escherichia coli aisladas de urocultivos [tesis de pregrado]. Lima: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2015. Disponible en: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/cybertesis/7519/Tolentino_le%20-%20Resumen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

11. Kim D, Subhadra B, Kang H, Woo K, Kim J, Son Y, et al. Virulence properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with urinary tract infection in Korea. Genes Genomics. 2018;40(6):625-34. doi: 10.1007/s13258-018-0664-6.

12. Tabasi M. Genotypic Characterization of Virulence Factors in Escherichia coli Isolated from Patients with Acute Cystitis, Pyelonephritis and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):1-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21379.9009.

13. Rahdar M, Rashki A, Miri HR, Rashki Ghalehnoo M. Detection of pap, sfa, afa, foc, and fim Adhesin-Encoding Operons in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates Collected From Patients With Urinary Tract Infection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(8):e22647. doi: 10.5812/jjm.22647.

14. Berry R, Klummp D, Schaeffer A. Urothelial cultures support Intracellular Bacterial Community Formation by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Journal Infect Inmun. 2009; 77(7):2762-72. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00323-09.

15. Hanna T, Totsika M, Mansfield K. Host-Pathogen Checkpoints and Population Bottlenecks in Persistent and Intracellular Uropathogenic E. coli Bladder Infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(3):616-648. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00339.x.

16. Ramírez-Castillo FY, Moreno-Flores AC, Avelar-González FJ, Márquez-Díaz F, Harel J, Guerrero-Barrera AL. An evaluation of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in urinary tract infections from Aguascalientes, Mexico: cross-sectional study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12941-018-0286-5.

17. Tajbakhsh E, Ahmadi P, Abedpour-Dehkordi E, Arbab-Soleimani N, Khamesipour F. Biofilm formation, antimicrobial susceptibility, serogroups and virulence genes of uropathogenic E. coli isolated from clinical samples in Iran. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5(11):1-8. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4.

18. de Souza da-Silva AP, de Sousa VS, Martins N, da Silva RC, Bonelli RR, Riley LW, et al. Escherichia coli sequence type 73 as a cause of community acquired urinary tract infection in men and women in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;88(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.01.024.

19. Malekzadegan Y, Khashei R, Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H, Jahanabadi Z. Distribution of virulence genes and their association with antimicrobial resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Iranian patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3467-0.

 

Citation: Matta-Chuquisapon J, Valencia-Bazalar E, Marocho-Chahuayo L, Gonzales-Escalante E, Sevilla-Andrade CR. Presence of fimH and afa genes in urinary isolates of extended-spectrum betalactamases producing Escherichia coli in Lima, Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2020;37(2):282-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2020.372.4829.

Correspondence to: Jose Fernando Matta Chuquisapon; Calle José Santos Chocano 199, Ciudad Universitaria, Bellavista, Callao; josematta5511295@gmail.com.

Authorship contributions: All authors have participated in the research idea, conception of the article, data collection and study material, and writing of the article. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and assume responsibility for its content.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding sources: Self-funded.

Received: 23/09/2019

Approved: 15/04/2020

Online: 10/06/2020