Brief report

 

Frequency of colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Peru

 

Marjhory Zarate 1, Medical technologist
Delsy Barrantes 1, Medical technologist
Diego Cuicapuza 2, Medical technologist
Jorge Velasquez 3, Clinical Pathologist
Nathaly Fernández 3, Clinical Pathologist
Guillermo Salvatierra 2, Veterinarian
Jesus Tamariz 1, Microbiologist, Doctor of Science

1 Laboratorio de Resistencia Antimicrobiana e Inmunopatología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
2 Laboratorio de Genómica Microbiana, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
3 Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza, Lima, Perú.

This study is part of the bachelor’s thesis of Delsy Barrantes Salinas and Marjhory Zarate Estrada, "Resistencia antimicrobiana a colistina en Pseudomonas aeruginosa aisladas de tres establecimientos de salud de Lima, Perú", Facultad de Medicina Honorio Delgado; Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, presented in 2020.

 


ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the frequency of colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from three healthcare facilities in Lima and cryopreserved at the Laboratorio de Resistencia Antimicrobianos e Inmunopatología of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH). The colistin broth disk elution method was used for the phenotypic identification of colistin resistance. We detected the expression of the mcr-1 gene by using the phenotypic diffusion method with combined colistin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) disks; and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for molecular identification of the gene. Of the 97 isolates, 7 (7.2%) were resistant to colistin; however, none carried the mcr-1 gene. This is the first report from Peru on clinical isolates of colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which suggests the need for implementation of appropriate methodologies for the epidemiological surveillance of colistin-resistant pathogens.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Antimicrobial Drug Resistance; Colistin; Peru (Source: MeSH NLM).

 


INTRODUCTION

Pseudomona aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen of clinical and epidemiological relevance, associated with nosocomial infections including sepsis, pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Due to the intrinsic, acquired and adaptive resistance mechanisms that characterize this pathogen, the therapeutic alternatives for the infections it causes are limited to only a few groups of antibiotics. However, the high selective pressure exerted by antibiotics in hospital environments has generated a rapid global spread and dissemination of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa clones (1).

The concern related to this bacterium has been highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and in February 2017 included carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in the list of pathogens with critical priority, for which new antibiotics are required and that has forced the adoption of more aggressive treatment strategies, for example, the use of older antibiotics such as colistin, despite its high toxicity (2).

Colistin is a cyclic polypeptide antibiotic of cationic lipid nature discovered in 1947. It acts in the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacilli (GNB), binding electrostatically to lipid A, displacing Mg2+ and Ca2+ cations and inducing the opening of the outer membrane, osmotic changes in the periplasm and subsequent bacterial lysis (3). In clinical practice, adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity limited its use for years; however, colistimethate sodium is currently used as an inactive prodrug, which, in an aqueous medium, is transformed into colistin, thus reducing its harmful effects (4).

Different mechanisms of resistance to this polymyxin have been identified; one of them is the result of modifications of the lipopolysaccharides of the outer membrane (in lipid A) mediated by the addition of a 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (L-Ara4N) and phosphoethanolamine (PEtN). This modification of lipid A is regulated by the two-component systems (TCS) PhoP-PhoQ (PhoPQ) and PmrA-PmrB (PmrAB), resulting in the reduction of the outer membrane negative charge that generates colistin resistance (1,5).

On the other hand, plasmid resistance to colistin called mcr-1 (mobile colistin resistance), a member of the family of phosphoethanolamine transferase enzymes, capable of modifying the target site of colistin, decreasing its affinity for lipid A by adding phosphoethanolamine, was described for the first time in China in 2015 (6). That same year, in Vietnam, the first clinical case was reported in a diarrheal sample, cryopreserved until 2008, in which a Shigella sonnei carrying the gene was isolated (7). To date, 10 genes homologous to mcr-1 and 21 allelic variants have been characterized (8). This gene is transmitted by plasmids, mainly associated with the X4 incompatibility group (IncX4), which allows its horizontal transfer between different GNB species (9).

In 2016, Arcilla et al. reported two ESBL-producing Escherichia coli strains carrying the mcr-1 gene isolated from diarrheal samples of Dutch travelers from Peru, Colombia and Bolivia after their return to the Netherlands (10). In Latin America, the mcr-1 gene has been reported in Argentina, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Brazil (11). In Peru, in 2018, Ugarte et al. reported for the first time isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying mcr-1 (12). The plasmid mechanism mediated by the mcr-1 gene was first detected in P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in a multicenter study conducted in Pakistan in 2019 (13). In Peru, colistin resistance has not been reported so far, nor has the presence of the mcr-1 gene in P. aeruginosa isolates of clinical origin.

The emergence of colistin resistance through horizontal transfer of conjugative plasmids is of increasing concern worldwide due to its rapid dissemination.

Based on the above, this study was carried out to determine the frequency of colistin resistance by the colistin broth disk elution method (CBDE), the frequency of mcr-1 gene expression by the combined colistin-EDTA disk diffusion test (CDT) and the presence of the mcr-1 gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in P. aeruginosa isolates from three health facilities in Lima, Peru.

 

KEY MESSAGES

Motivation for the study: Given the possibility of underreporting of colistin resistance in hospitals and clinics in Peru, three high-performance methodologies were used to determine the frequency of colistin resistance by chromosomal and plasmid mechanisms.

Main findings: We identified 7.2% of colistin-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates not carrying the mcr-1 gene.

Implications: Colistin resistance was determined for the first time in Pseudomona aeruginosa in Peru.

 

THE STUDY

A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in which P. aeruginosa isolates of clinical origin from three health facilities in Lima (two public and one private) were evaluated from January 2018 to October 2019. The isolates were cryopreserved in the strain bank of the Antimicrobial Resistance and Immunopathology Laboratory of the Research and Development Laboratories (LID) of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH).

Phenotypic detection of colistin resistance

A total of 97 isolates of P. aeruginosa were recovered in Cetrimide selective medium (Liofilchem, Italy) and incubated for 24 hours at 35 °C. Colistin resistance was determined using the CBDE method, described by the Antimicrobial Referral Laboratory of Argentina "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán" (14). The isolates were classified, based on the results of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), intermediate (MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL) or resistant (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL), for which we used the cut-off points established in the M100-ED30: 2020 guide of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (15).

Combined disc diffusion test

Isolates were inoculated onto Müller Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) from a tube with physiological saline at a concentration equivalent to tube no. 0.5 on the McFarland scale. Two sensitivity discs were used, one with 10 μg of colistin (Oxoid, England) and the second with 10 μg of colistin plus 10 μL of EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at a concentration of 100 mM. A difference ≥ 3 mm between the inhibition halos of colistin plus EDTA compared to that observed with the colistin disc alone was considered positive for mcr-1 gene expression; the method was standardized by Esposito et al. (16).

Detection of the mcr-1 gene

For molecular identification of the gene, genomic DNA was extracted from the 97 isolates by the heat shock method; and PCR for the mcr-1 gene was carried out using the following primers: forward: CLR5-F1 (5’-CGGTCAGTCCGTTTGTTC-3’) and reverse: MCR-indel-R1 (5’-CTTGGTCGGTCGGTCTGTAGGG-3). Amplification was carried out under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 sec; 45 °C for 30 sec; 72 °C for 30 sec; and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min, according to the methodology described by Liu YY (6). DNA size was verified with DNA ladder 100 bp (Thermo Scientific, USA), considering products of 309 bp.

For validation of the results, in all tests we used an E. coli strain molecularly characterized as a carrier of the mcr-1 gene as a positive control, from the Laboratory of Antimicrobial Resistance and Immunopathology, and an E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a negative control.

Data analysis

The statistical program STATA, version 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to report absolute frequencies and percentage of the variables of interest obtained from the study.

Ethical Aspects

The protocol was registered and approved in the Decentralized System of Information and Monitoring of Research (SIDISI:103444) - University Directorate of Research, Science and Technology (DUICT); and, prior to its execution, the UPCH Ethics Committee (CIE-UPCH: CAREGORVEI-141-19) evaluated it. The study followed the guidelines of good practices and ethics in biomedical research. 

FINDINGS

Of the total of 97 P. aeruginosa isolates of clinical origin, the CBDE method identified 7 (7.2%) colistin-resistant isolates with an MIC equal to 4 µg/mL; 49 (50.5%) had an MIC equal to 2 µg/mL; and 41 isolates (42.3%) had an MIC less than or equal to 1 µg/mL and were categorized as intermediate to colistin. The antibiotic concentration that inhibited 50% and 90% of the isolates (MIC50 and MIC90) was 2 µg/mL. Colistin-resistant isolates were obtained from different clinical samples, such as wound secretion (n = 2), blood (n = 3), urine (n = 1) and feces (n = 1). Of the total colistin-resistant isolates, 2 were from health facility 1 (6.9%, n = 29), 2 from health facility 2 (12.5%, n = 16) and 3 from health facility 3 (5.8%, n = 52) (Table 1). The result of the CDT method was negative for all strains evaluated. Likewise, the PCR test did not detect any isolates carrying the mcr-1 gene (Table 2).

 

Table 1. Bacterial resistance to colistin and characteristics of clinical isolates. 

Characteristic

Total
(N = 97)

Colistin a

Resistant
(n = 7)

Intermediate
(n = 90)

N (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Institution

 

 

 

Health center 1

29 (29.9)

2 (6.9)

27 (93.1)

Health center 2

16 (16.5)

2 (12.5)

14 (87.5)

Health center 3

52 (53.6)

3 (5.8)

49 (94.2)

Sample type

 

 

 

Bronchial aspirate

4 (4.1)

-

4 (100.0)

Bile

1 (1.0)

-

1 (100.0)

Stool culture

2 (2.1)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

Thoracic drainage

1 (1.0)

-

1 (100.0)

Sputum

1 (1.0)

-

1 (100.0)

Blood culture

11 (11.3)

3 (27.3)

8 (72.7)

Secretions

59 (60.8)

2 (3.4)

57 (96.6)

Urine culture

18 (18.6)

1 (5.6)

17 (94.4)

a Colistin broth disk elution method (CBDE)

a Colistin broth disk elution method (CBDE)

 

Table 2. Colistin broth disk elution method, combined disk diffusion test and polymerase chain reaction for mcr-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa colistin-resistant phenotype. 

Strain code

Health center

Sample type

CBDE

CDT

PCR mcr-1 gene

2041

1

Secretion culture

4 mg/mL (R)

0 mm

Negative

2043

1

Urine culture

4 mg/mL (R)

0 mm

Negative

1002

2

Stool culture

4 mg/mL (R)

0 mm

Negative

1005

2

Blood culture

4 mg/mL (R)

2 mm

Negative

430

3

Secretion culture

4 mg/mL (R)

1 mm

Negative

631

3

Blood culture

4 mg/mL (R)

1 mm

Negative

806

3

Blood culture

4 mg/mL (R)

1 mm

Negative

CBDE: colistin broth disk elution method; CDT: combined disk diffusion test; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; R: resistant.

 

DISCUSSION

The results of this study show that 7.2% of P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to colistin. This finding is similar to the 5.2% reported for Latin America (17) and Europe 4% (3). In Peru, colistin resistance had not been reported in P. aeruginosa prior to this study (18).

Several studies have determined that conventional methods used in antibiograms, such as agar disc diffusion, Epsilon test, even commercial systems such as VITEK (Biomerieux), Phoenix (Becton Dickinson), used in hospitals throughout the country, generate false susceptibility to colistin, which could be leading to underreporting of real resistance (19).

Given the current importance of colistin and the technical problems related to the determination of resistance, a study with methods of proven effectiveness was necessary. The CBDE test is a good alternative in terms of cost-effectiveness, efficacy and performance, and can be applied routinely in clinical microbiology laboratories (3,19). The study conducted by Humphries, et al. supports the application of this test in P. aeruginosa with an essential concordance of 94.4% and a categorical concordance of 97.9% with the MICs obtained by the broth microdilution method considered as the reference test. Based on these results, the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) approved the CBDE method for resistance testing in Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa (18,20).

The use of chelators such as EDTA for the inhibition of phosphoethanolamine transferase produced by the mcr-1 gene has become widespread in clinical microbiology laboratories. The CDT test for presumptive detection of phenotypic expression of mcr gene variants by alteration of the zeta potential showed promising results, as it is a rapid and inexpensive alternative in E. coli isolates (16). Our results showed that P. aeruginosa isolates with a colistin-resistant phenotype (MIC ≥4 µg/mL) did not have a difference ≥ 3 mm in the diameter of the inhibition zone of the colistin/EDTA disk compared with the colistin disk, a feature that is related to the absence of the mcr-1 gene. These results are similar to those published by Abd El-Baky, et al. who found that 50.0% of P. aeruginosa with an MIC ≥ 32 µg/mL and negative CDT did not have the mcr-1 gene (5).

In this study, the screening of the mrc-1 gene by PCR was negative for all the strains evaluated, which indicates that the resistance to colistin that we have detected could be due to the presence of allelic variants of the gene or to chromosomal mechanisms that we have not been able to identify with the methodology used. It is important to consider that the molecular identification of the mcr-1 gene and its variants does not necessarily confirm colistin resistance in bacteria that carry it, since susceptible phenotypes may be present (8).

Recently, it was identified that the main mechanism responsible for chromosomal colistin resistance in GNB is the result of specific mutations, environmental stimuli and inactivation by insertion into the PhoP-PhoQ (PhoPQ) and PmrA-PmrB (PmrAB) two-component system (TCS), leading to overexpression of the pmrHFIJKLM operon. This results in the addition of L-Ara4Ns and PEtNs to the lipid A of the outer membrane of P. aeruginosa, which decreases the net negative charge of phosphate residues that affects colistin affinity (4,5).

Despite the alarming emergence of colistin-resistant variants of P. aeruginosa, the implementation of sensitive and specific susceptibility testing in the routine work of clinical microbiology laboratories has been slow. In this study, we used well-defined protocols combining phenotypic susceptibility testing and molecular methods. However, there are important limitations in our research; the isolates included in the study were obtained from three health facilities during a specific period of time, therefore, our results cannot be inferred to the current situation in the hospital setting; likewise, genes homologous to mcr-1 were not evaluated; and the chromosomal mechanisms involved in colistin resistance were not characterized.

In conclusion, the CBDE method identified 7.2% of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa resistant to colistin, which is the first report of resistance to this antibiotic in Peru. This finding shows the need to implement, in our country, surveillance of colistin resistance in P. aeruginosa through the application of appropriate methodologies.

 

REFERENCES

1. Lee JY, Park YK, Chung ES, Na IY, Ko KS. Evolved resistance to colistin and its loss due to genetic reversion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 25543. doi: 10.1038/srep25543.

2. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318-27. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3.

3. Li Z, Cao Y, Yi L, Liu JH, Yang Q. Emergent Polymyxin Resistance: End of an Era?. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(10):ofz368. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz368.

4. Grégoire N, Aranzana-Climent V, Magréault S, Marchand S, Couet W. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Colistin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(12):1441-60. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0561-1.

5. Abd El-Baky RM, Masoud SM, Mohamed DS, Waly NG, Shafik EA, Mohareb DA, et al. Prevalence and Some Possible Mechanisms of Colistin Resistance Among Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:323-332. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S238811.

6. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7.

7. Pham-Thanh D, Thanh-Tuyen H, Nguyen-Thi-Nguyen T, Chung-The H, Wick RR, Thwaites GE, et al. Inducible colistin resistance via a disrupted plasmid-borne mcr-1 gene in a 2008 Vietnamese Shigella sonnei isolate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(8):2314-2317. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw173.

8. Wang C, Feng Y, Liu L, Wei L, Kang M, Zong Z. Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):508-516. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1732231.

9. Gröndahl-Yli-Hannuksela K, Lönnqvist E, Kallonen T, Lindholm L, Jalava J, Rantakokko-Jalava K, et al. The first human report of mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, in Finland. APMIS. 2018;126(5):413-417. doi: 10.1111/apm.12834.

10. Arcilla MS, Hattem JM van, Matamoros S, Melles DC, Penders J, Jong MD de, et al. Dissemination of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):147-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00541-1.

11. Quiroga C, Nastro M, Di Conza J. Current scenario of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Latin America. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2019;51(1):93­-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2018.05.001.

12. Ugarte Silva RG, Olivo López JM, Corso A, Pasteran F, Albornoz E, Blácido ZPS. Resistencia a colistín mediado por el gen mcr-1 identificado en cepas de Escherichia coli y Klebsiella pneumoniae. Primeros reportes en el Perú. An Fac Med. 2018;79(3):213-7. doi: 10.15381/anales.v79i3.15313.

13. Hameed F, Khan MA, Muhammad H, Sarwar T, Bilal H, Rehman TU, et al. Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene in Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Pakistan. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52:e20190237. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0237-2019.

14. Servicio Antimicrobianos - INEI-MALBRAN. Metodo de elusion de discos de colistin. Buenos Aires; 2017. Disponible en: http://antimicro-bianos.com.ar/ATB/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Protocolo-Met-deEluci%C3%B3n-de-Discos-de-COL-version3-Nov2017.pdf.

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 30th informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2020.

16. Esposito F, Fernandes MR, Lopes R, Muñoz M, Sabino CP, Cunha MP, et al. Detection of Colistin-Resistant MCR-1-Positive Escherichia coli Using Inhibition by EDTA and Zeta Potential Assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(12):3454-3465. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00835-17.

17. Karlowsky JA, Kazmierczak KM, Bouchillon SK, Jonge BLM de, Stone GG, Sahm DF. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin American Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01814-18.

18. Fernández DF, García C, Zegarra J, Granados L. Susceptibilidad anti­microbiana en aislamientos de secreción endotraqueal en la unidad de cuidados intensivos de un hospital nacional de Lima, 2016. Rev Medica Hered. 2017;28(4):236-236. doi: 10.20453/rmh.v28i4.3223.

19. Sekyere JO. Mcr colistin resistance gene: a systematic review of current diagnostics and detection methods. MicrobiologyOpen . 2019;8(4):e00682. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.682.

20. Humphries RM, Green DA, Schuetz AN, Bergman Y, Lewis S, Yee R, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution and Colistin Agar Test: a Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57:e01269-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01269-19.

 

Funding: The study was funded with resources from the Laboratory of Antimicrobial Resistance-LID-UPCH.

Cite as: Zarate M, Barrantes D, Cuicapuza D, Velasquez J, Fernández N, Salvatierra G, et al. [Frequency of colistin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Peru]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2021;38(2):308-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.382.6977.

Correspondence: Jesus Tamariz-Ortiz; Av. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, San Martín de Porres, Lima, Perú; jesus.tamariz@upch.pe

Authorship contributions: All authors participated in the research idea, conception of the article, collection of data and study material, and writing of the article. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. 

Received: 29/12/2020

Approved: 07/04/2021

Online: 26/05/2021