River boats as a means of expansion of Aedes aegypti towards border zones of the peruvian amazon

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

River boats as a means of expansion of Aedes aegypti towards border zones of the peruvian amazon

Carmen Sinti-Hesse1,a, Fabiola Díaz-Soria1,a, Wilma Casanova-Rojas2,b, Cristiam Carey-Ángeles2,c, Rodil Tello-Espinoza3,d , José Espinoza4,e, Karine Zevallos2,f

1 Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales «Hugo Pesce-Maxime Kuckynski», Instituto Nacional de Salud, Iquitos, Perú.
2 Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Perú.
3 Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Perú.
4 Facultad de Ingeniería Económica, Estadística y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú.
a Biologist; b professional degree in nursing, master of Public Health; c medical doctor, master of Public Health; d forest engineering, Ph.D. in environmental sciences; e professional degree in Statistics, Master of Science; f medical doctor, Ph.D. in Public Health.

 


ABSTRACT

Objectives. To assess the entomological risk of Aedes aegypti in boats traversing border river routes in Loreto. Materials and Methods. The study population consisted of mosquitoes present in three boats covering border routes in Loreto. The entomological risk of Aedes was determined through ovitraps, the inspection of breeding sites, and the collection and taxonomic identification of adult mosquitoes. Results. The entomological risk varied according to the route and the season. A medium to very high entomological risk was identified in the high-water season and on the outward route to the border areas. The predominant vector population in the low-water season was Mansonia sp. (74.8%), Culex sp. (12.8%), and Aedes aegypti (0.4%); in the high-water season, Culex sp. (45.1%), Mansonia sp. (26.8%), and Aedes aegypti (19.7%). In no case did we find Aedes albopictus. Conclusions. There is moderate to high entomological risk during the high-water season in riverboats traveling from Iquitos to the border areas of Loreto. Our results show that river boats are a means of expansion of Aedes aegypti.

Keywords: Mosquito vectors; Aedes; Sanitary control of harbors and crafts; Border areas (source: MeSH NLM).

 


INTRODUCTION

Aedes aegypti is the vector responsible for the spread of diseases like dengue, chikungunya, and zika, which are increasingly important worldwide both for their disease burden and for their epidemic potential(1-3). The prevention of these diseases through a vaccine and other innovative interventions is promising, but they are not yet available in the short term(4,5). Therefore, vector surveillance continues to be the main tool for the prevention and control of Aedes aegypti (6).

Globally, it has been demonstrated that the expansion of economic activities, such as ground or river transportation, from urban to rural areas, has led to the spread of Aedes aegypti, increasing the risk in the rural areas(7-9). Socioeconomic determinants, such as poverty and lack of basic services, combined with the vector increase, have made these areas targets for epidemic outbreaks (7,10).

The presence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus has been reported in Manaus (Brazil) and Leticia (Colombia)(7,9), and in the region of Loreto (Peru) Aedes aegypti (11,12) is present in most of its districts. In this epidemiological context, the navigation of river boats could spread Aedes from populated cities to remote areas with low vector density(8,9). The increase in the mosquito population in border regions could have serious consequences for the indigenous population; it could cause the collapse of health services and increase morbidity and mortality from dengue, chikungunya, and zika due to the limited response capacity of the health centers in rural areas.

The Executive Directorate of Environmental Health of Loreto (DESA Loreto), which is the local health authority, conducts the entomological surveillance of Aedes aegypti in the community, inside and around dwellings. Surveillance is carried out by a health professional, who visits and inspects water containers and collects the larvae in them(11). This practice has obstacles such as the scarcity of human resources, limited economic resources for extramural activities, and delays in the collection and processing of the epidemiological information(13). As a result, the use of ovitraps was introduced in 2015, as part of the entomological surveillance of Aedes aegypti (14,15).

River boats are a popular means of transportation in areas of the jungle and have characteristics conducive to the reproduction of Aedes. They have spaces with shade and humidity, transport water in different containers and move with cargo and passengers through populated and rural cities(9). Therefore, we consider it imperative to know the entomological risk, presence, and abundance of Aedes in these vessels and demonstrate that they can be vehicles for the spread of Aedes in the Amazon basin. We also consider it necessary to evaluate the use of ovitraps to detect populations of Aedes aegypti (16) in this new scenario, not described in previous publications.

 

 

The objective of our study was to evaluate the entomological risk posed by Aedes aegypti during the river travel of boats with routes along Loreto border areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DESIGN AND LOCATION

A longitudinal descriptive study was conducted in the Loreto region of the Peruvian Amazon. Loreto is an endemic region and has the highest frequency of cases of dengue, zika and malaria in Peru. The study was carried out from September to November 2016 (high-water season) and from May to July 2017 (low-water season) in river boats with border routes toward Caballococha (3°54´29.44"-S and 70°30´58.02"-W and 77 masl on the banks of the Amazon River); Santa Rosa (4°13'10.41''-S and 69°57'59.64''-W and 100 masl on the banks of the Amazon River, at the border with Colombia and Brazil), and El Estrecho (2°27´1.6"-S and 72°40´4.4"-O and 110 masl on the banks of the Putumayo River).

Three-story vessels carrying passengers and cargo, with an average length of 50 meters, were selected. Thirteen vessels traveling to Caballococha and Santa Rosa and four vessels going to El Estrecho met these criteria. One vessel per route was selected at random.

DATA COLLECTION

Authorization from the director of DIRESA Loreto (Official Letter No. 483-2015- GRL-DRSL/30.09-INVESTIGATION) for the execution of the project was obtained. The authorizations were signed, which allowed entrance to the vessels, as well as the presence of a member of the research team to travel on the routes and perform entomological surveillance along the way. Two trips were made, one during the high-water season (characterized by the increase in river flow) and one during the low-water season (characterized by the decrease in river flow)(17). Three different vessels were analyzed on their way to Caballococha, Santa Rosa and El Estrecho. The entomological surveillance was carried out during the outward and the return journey, performing a total of two revisions per boat, for the collection of eggs, larvae/pupae, and mosquitoes (Table 1) (Figure 1).

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION

The information was collected using an instrument designed and digitized on an electronic tablet, using the Open Data Kit with data capturing, stored locally and transferred later on to the cloud (Google Drive) with a backup copy available off-line and transferred later to the Center for Research in Tropical Diseases (CIETROP) of the National Health Institute (INS). The strips of paper with eggs were captured with HAD-CCD cameras of 20.1 megapixels, stored in memories and processed with the program Image J for strips of up to 20 eggs; for a larger number of eggs the Stereomicroscope SZX16 was used. All potential larval and pupal hatcheries were reviewed. Adult mosquitoes were collected with Prokopack aspirators. The coordinates were taken with a Garmin Etrex 20X GPS.

ENTOMOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT

Entomological risk was defined as the presence and abundance of insect vectors of a disease in a given place(18). It was defined using the following indicators: ovitraps positivity index (OPI), egg density index (EDI)(14) and adult index (AI)(13).

Inspection of eggs in ovitraps: ovitraps are plastic deposits that carry an identification label on the outside. Paper towel is used as medium and grass infusion is used as attractant. The criterion used for the placement of ovitraps was based on the description contained in the technical standard for dwellings(11). Each floor of the boat was considered a dwelling and ovitraps were placed every 50 meters, taking into account that the flying range of the mosquito is between 50 and 100 meters; to place the ovitraps inside the boats, dark areas were chosen, free of wind flows and with no exposure to rain(14). When the paper was positive, it was picked up and replaced with another. Then, the image was captured, the geographical location of the place was taken(19) (Table 2) and the paper was stored in a labeled plastic bag.

 

 

Inspection of larvae/pupae: on each of the floors of the boats, containers with water that could contain larvae or pupae were located, in accordance with the format for hatcheries used by DESA Loreto (11,20).

 

Adult capture: adult mosquitoes were captured with Prokopack aspirators along the walls, floors and spaces, coinciding with their feeding times (8.00 to 10.00 h and 17.00 to 19.00 h) (21).

Later on, they were exposed to ethyl acetate for their preservation and transport in petri dishes until they were taken to the CIETROP laboratory to be identified.

DATA ANALYSIS

The entomological risk was measured using entomological indicators such as the Aedes density index based on the egg density index (EDI), which is obtained dividing the number of eggs found by the number of positive ovitraps, classifying as low risk: from 1 to <5 eggs, medium risk: 5 to <20 eggs, high risk: 20 to <40 eggs and very high risk: >40 eggs (14). The Adult Index (AI) refers to the number of mosquitoes, classifying as low risk from 1 to 3 mosquitoes and high risk: >3 mosquitoes (13). The Aedes positivity index based on the ovitraps positivity index (OPI), which is obtained dividing the number of positive ovitraps by the number of exposed ovitraps x 100, classifies as low risk: <5%, medium risk: 5% to <20%, high risk: 20% to <40% and very high risk: >40% (14). The collected vectorial populations were identified with taxonomic keys (22).

The statistical procedures for data processing were expressed through frequencies and percentages. Version 21 of statistical package SPSS was used.

ETHICAL ASPECTS

This research posed a minimal risk to the people on the participating riverboats. The entomological inspections carried out in the study were identical to the ones carried out by DESA Loreto. There was no increased risk of transmission of these diseases to participants beyond the risk experienced by living in an endemic area. The results of this study will be of great benefit to local vector control activities. All ethical considerations were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Research Committee of the INS through directorate resolution N°580-2016-OGITT-OPE/INS.

RESULTS

DENSITY AND POSITIVITY INDEX OF Aedes sp.

On the route to Caballococha, the IDH and IA indices were 0% on the outward and the return trips, both in growing and in emptying seasons. On the route to Santa Rosa during the growing season, 26 to 66 eggs were found, while no eggs were found during the emptying season. On the route to El Estrecho, up to seven eggs were found during the growing season. The interpretations of these findings are detailed in Table 3. In none of the routes was it possible to find eggs of Aedes albopictus.

On the route to Caballococha the OPI was low during the outward leg and the return leg, in both growing and emptying seasons. On the route to Santa Rosa, the OPI was 14% on the round trip during the growing season, and in the emptying season it was 0%. On the route to El Estrecho, the OPI was 20% in both growing and emptying seasons during the outward journey and 0% on the return journey (Table 3). None of the routes showed Aedes albopictus in the ovitraps.

The containers that could house Aedes larvae and/or pupae were inspected; we found, in greater proportion, both in growing and in emptying seasons, servers (plates, frying pans, plate holders), buckets and pots and, to a lesser extent, tanks, cylinders and tires. No positive hatchery was found.

VECTOR POPULATIONS

The vector population found was composed of Aedes aegypti, Aediomia, Anopheles nuneztovari, Anopheles peryasui, Anopheles trianulatus, Coquelletidia, Culex melanoconium, Culex sp. and Mansonia sp. The predominant vector population in the emptying season was Mansonia sp. (74.8%), that transmits lymphatic filariasis, Culex sp. (12.8%), that transmits encephalitis; and oropuche, filariasis, Nile virus and Aedes aegypti (0.4%), that transmit dengue, zika and chikungunya (23.24); during the growing season, more prevalent were Culex sp. (45.1%), Mansonia sp. (26.8%) and Aedes aegypti (19.7%). In Table 4, the vectorial populations are described according to trajectory and season.

 

 

DISCUSSION

It was demonstrated that during the growing season an entomological risk of Aedes aegypti exists in river boats that travel from endemic urban populations to non-endemic rural areas. We can therefore consider river boats as a means of spreading Aedes aegypti.

The main means of transportation in the Amazon are river boats, which have different characteristics depending on the number of passengers, type of cargo and distance to travel. Different locations have proved to be reservoirs of Aedes aegypti, however, those studies were carried out in cities, houses or ports, and not on the river route of a vessel (8.9). During the travelling of the fluvial boats no positive breeding places were evident, but potential breeding places were identified, such as servers (plates, frying pans, plate holders), buckets and pots and, to a lesser extent, tanks, cylinders and tires. In spite of not having found immature forms in the potential hatcheries and a smaller adult population of Aedes aegypti with respect to the other vectors, the present study demonstrates that fluvial boats constitute a means of spreading the Aedes aegypti to less populated places that have the appropriate conditions for its establishment.

Assessing the entomological risk during the journey made it possible to learn about the operational dynamics of the vessels in situ and identify specific targets for future interventions in health. For example, we now know that in the route to the town of El Estrecho, being the longest, the water supply is transported in unprotected containers, and it was on this route that a higher EDI and OPI was evidenced.

During one of the periods of the study (September to November 2016) an outbreak of zika occurred in the city of Iquitos, which spread rapidly to the province of Ramón Castilla and to rural areas of the province of Maynas, areas through which the fluvial boats that were evaluated in our study travelled. Although the design of our research does not allow us to state that river boats dispersed zika, it is possible that they contributed to this epidemic, as described in other epidemics worldwide (3.25).

Our results on Aedes aegypti reinforce what has been previously published about its capacity to follow an expansion pattern linked to the growth of cities, new roads and along rivers (8). The capacity of Aedes aegypti to infest growing urban areas can be accelerated by the means of transportation that can transport these vectors to urban areas such as Iquitos, especially if they return from areas that border the Brazilian and Colombian Amazonia, where there is a presence of Aedes albopictus and chikungunya outbreaks.

No eggs, pupae or adult forms of Aedes albopictus were collected, coinciding with what was reported by a local study in a border region of Loreto (26). Possibly the factors that prevent the establishment of Aedes albopictus could be the Amazon River acting as a geographic barrier, and the fact that the products transported on boats from Leticia and Tabatinga to Santa Rosa do not function as breeding grounds for this vector. Likewise, it is not possible to confirm the absence of the vector when the surveillance carried out lasted less than one year (11).

The EDI and AI were higher during the growing season and when the boats departed from Iquitos, an endemic city with high population density(15,27); the population density and rainfall coincide with an increase in the presence of the vector at every stage (8).

In connection to the vector population, Aedes aegypti was not predominant and was only greater during growing season. The mosquito with the highest population was Mansonia sp. followed by Culex, evidencing the richness of mosquito species and their seasonal distribution. Even though different vectors in adult forms were found during the inspection of ovitraps, only egg from Aedes, not from other vectors, was evident (28). The emergence and re-emergence of some mosquito-borne illnesses is one of the most relevant aspects in the American continent, reason why knowing the mosquito fauna, as well as its distribution, is imperative for adequate vector control and for establishing strategies to prevent the spread of communicable diseases (29).

Ovitraps made it possible to determine a very high EDI on one route, demonstrating their usefulness and sensitivity in river transport, which confirms that they can be used in new places and surveillance conditions or research studies (12,30).

Some limitations have to do with the design, which did not allow to assess the degree of parity of mosquitoes, perform molecular tests, and include the evaluation of people with fever during the river trip. Despite these limitations, our study has shown that river boats are a means of expansion of Aedes aegypti to rural areas of the Peruvian Amazon. Local health authorities should therefore strengthen vector surveillance in river boats.

 

Acknowledgements: To the staff of the health care clinics, schools, and military camps who allowed the use of their facilities. To the research unit of Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana. To Dr. Amy Morrison, honorable professor of Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana. To Ana Claudia Ríos Araujo and Valeria Pinedo Torres for their invaluable support inside the boats during the implementation of the project. To Miguel A. Farfán García, Víctor A. Torres Ocmin, Ricarte R. Ruiz Chávez and Rosa Liz Castro Bardales, support staff of CIETROP.

Authors’ Contributions: CSH participated in the conception, design of the manuscript, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting ,and critical review of the content of the manuscript. FDS participated in the conception, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, editing and important critical review of the content of the manuscript. WCR participated in the drafting and major critical review of the content of the manuscript. CCA participated in the drafting and major critical review of the content of the manuscript. RTE participated in the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and critical review of the content of the manuscript. JE participated in the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and major critical review of the content of the manuscript. KZ was involved in manuscript design, analysis, data interpretation, drafting, and major critical review of the context of the manuscript.

Funding: Research funds from Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana. Rectoral Resolution No. 0772-2015-UNAP.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors report no potential conflicts.

 

REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for dengue prevention and control, 2012-2020. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 [citado 3 de mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75303/1/9789241504034_eng.pdf.

2. Morens D, Fauci A. Chikungunya at the door—Déjà vu all over again?. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):885-7.

3. Núñez E, Vásquez M, Beltrán-Luque B, Padgett D. Virus Zika en Centroamérica y sus complicaciones. Acta Méd Peru. 2016;33(1):42-9.

4. Slifka M. Vaccine-Mediated Immunity Against Dengue and the Potential for Long-Term Protection Against Disease. Front Immunol. 2014;5:195. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00195.

5. McNaughton D, Huong-Duong T. Designing a Community Engagement Framework for a New Dengue Control Method: A Case Study from Central Vietnam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002794.

6. Hernández-Ávila J, Rodríguez M, Santos-Luna R, Sánchez-Castañeda V, Román-Pérez S, Ríos-Salgado V, et al. Nation-Wide, Web-Based, Geographic Information System for the Integrated Surveillance and Control of Dengue Fever in Mexico. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070231.

7. Barbosa MG, Fé NF, Jesus RD, Rodriguez IC, Monteiro WM, Mourão MP, et al. Aedes aegypti e fauna associada em área rural de Manaus, na Amazônia brasileira. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42(2):213-6.

8. Guagliardo S, Barboza J, Morrison A, Astete H, Vazquez-Prokopec G, Kitron U. Patterns of Geographic Expansion of Aedes aegypti in the Peruvian Amazon. Barrera R, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8):e3033. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003033.

9. Guagliardo S, Morrison A, Barboza J, Requena E, Astete H, Vazquez-Prokopec G, et al. River Boats Contribute to the Regional Spread of the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003648. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003648.

10. Harrington L, Fleisher A, Ruiz-Moreno D, Vermeylen F, Wa C, Poulson R, et al. Heterogeneous Feeding Patterns of the Dengue Vector, Aedes aegypti, on Individual Human Hosts in Rural Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8):e3048. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003048.

11. Dirección General de Salud Ambiental. Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Norma Técnica de Salud para la Implementación de la Vigilancia y Control de Aedes aegypti, Vector del Dengue en el Territorio Nacional. Primera Edición [Internet]. Lima: MINSA; 2011 [citado3mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.digesa.minsa.gob.pe/publicaciones/descargas/NORMA%20Aedes%20aegypti_DSB.pdf.

12. Cabezas C, Fiestas V, García-Mendoza M, Palomino M, Mamani E, Donaires F. Dengue en el Perú: a un cuarto de siglo de su reemergencia. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32(1):146-56.

13. Villaseca P, Cáceres A, Linares N. Eficacia de las ovitrampas para la detección rápida de Aedes aegypti en Chanchamayo (Junín) y Pucallpa (Ucayali), Perú. Bol - Inst Nac Salud. 2006;12(11-12):321-2.

14. Ministerio de Salud del Perú, Dirección General de Intervenciones Estratégicas en Salud Pública. Protocolo Sanitario de urgencia para el reforzamiento de la Vigilancia Entomológica del vector Aedes aegypti mediante el uso de ovitrampas para Establecimientos de Salud. Primera Edición [Internet]. Lima: MINSA; 2016 [citado 3 mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: http://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/3817.pdf.

15. Veiga-Acioli R. Uso de ovitrampas como herramienta para el monitoreo de poblaciones deuA Aedes spp en el barrio de Recife [Tesis de Maestría]. Recife, Brasil: Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; 2006.

16. Domínguez-Galera M. Evaluación de ovitrampas como sistema de vigilancia entomológica en sitios públicos de Chetumal, Quintana Roo [Tesis Doctoral]. Nuevo León, México: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; 2010.

17. Sistema de Información del Agua y las Cuencas de la Amazonía Peruana [Internet]. SIAGUA; 2019 [citado 3 mayo de 2019]. Características de las aguas amazónicas. Disponible en: http://www.siaguaamazonia.org.pe/caracteristicas_hidricos.html.

18. Norma oficial mexicana, para la vigilancia epidemiológica, prevención y control de las enfermedades transmitidas por vector. NOM-032-SSA2-2010 de 01/06/2011. Disponible en: http://www.cenaprece.salud.gob.mx/programas/interior/vectores/descargas/pdf/nom_032_ssa2_2010_norma_petv.pdf.

19. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Capítulo 19 Departamento Loreto. Principales Indicadores Departamentales 2009 - 2015 [Internet]. Lima: INEI; 2019 [citado 3 mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1340/cuadros/cap18.pdf.

20. Durand Velazco S, Fiestas Solórzano V, Sihuincha Maldonado M, Chávez Lencinas C, Vásquez Vela V, et al. Impacto de la epidemia de dengue con un nuevo linaje del Denv-2 genotipo americano / asiático en la demanda de servicios del hospital de apoyo de Iquitos “César Garayar García”. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2011;28(1):157.

21. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Dengue: Información general. [Internet]. Washington DC: PAHO; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4493:2010-informacion-general-dengue&Itemid=40232&lang=es.

22. Consoli R, deOliveira R. Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Editora FIOCRUZ; 1994. 225 p.

23. Swiger SL. Los mosquitos y las enfermedades que transmiten [Internet]. Texas: The Texas A&M Agrilife Extension Service; 2019 [citado 12 marzo de 2019]. Disponible en: https://cdn-ext.agnet.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Los-mosquitos-y-las-enfermedades-que-transmiten.pdf.

24. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Diez enfermedades transmitidas por vectores que ponen en riesgo a la población de las Américas [Internet]. Washington DC: PAHO; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9438:2014-10-vector-borne-diseases-that-put-population-americas-at-risk&Itemid=135&lang=es.

25. Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Dirección y Control de Enfermedades. Enfermedad por virus Zika -Perú 2016 y 2017 [Internet]. Lima: Ministerio de Salud del Perú; 2017 [citado 3 mayo de 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/vigilancia/sala/2017/SE08/zika.pdf.

26. Rios-Araujo A. Positividad y Riesgo Entomológico de Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) relacionado con los factores ambientales en la localidad de Santa Rosa, Loreto - Perú [Tesis]. Iquitos: Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana; 2015.

27. Rubio-Palis Y, Pérez-Ybarra LM, Infante-Ruíz M, Comach G, Urdaneta-Márquez L. Influencia de las variables climáticas en la casuística de dengue y la abundancia de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) en Maracay, Venezuela. Boletin Malariol Salud Ambient. 2011;51(2):145-58.

28. Peraza Cuesta I, Pérez Castillo M, Mendizábal Alcalá ME, Valdés Miró V, Leyva Silva M, Marquetti Fernández M del C. Richness and distribution of Culicidae species in the province of Havana, Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2015;67(2):270-8.

29. Valdés-Miró V, Reyes-Arencibia M, Marquetti-Fernández M, Gonzales-Broche R. Riqueza de especies de mosquitos, distribución y sitios de cría en el Municipio Boyeros. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2013;65 (1):131-6.

30. Kilpatrick J, Tonn R, Jatanasen S. Evaluation of ultra-low-volume insecticide dispensing systems for use in single-engined aircraft and their effectiveness against Aedes aegypti populations in South-East Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 1970;42(1):1.

 

Correspondence to: Carmen Sinti Hesse
Address: Calle Guardia Republicana N° 190 – San Juan Bautista. Iquitos, Perú.
Phone: 956 428 149
Email: carsinhes@gmail.com

 

Receibed: 23/05/2019
Approved: 31/07/2019
Online: 27/08/2019

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.




Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública


Copyright  2019 Instituto Nacional de Salud. Lima, Perú. Todos los derechos reservados
ISSN electrónica 1726-4642 - ISSN impresa 1726-4634
El contenido de este sitio es para todos los interesados en ciencias de la salud
Licencia Creative Commons