Clinical practice guidelines in Peru: evaluation of its quality using the AGREE II instrument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2016.334.2559Keywords:
Practice guidelines, Peru, Quality of health careAbstract
To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) put into practice by the Peruvian Ministry of Health (MINSA), 17 CPGs from the ministry, published between 2009 and 2014, were independently evaluated by three methodologic experts using the AGREE II instrument. The score of AGREE II domains was low and very low in all CPGs: scope and purpose (medium, 44%), clarity of presentation (medium, 47%), participation of decision-makers (medium, 8%), methodological rigor (medium, 5%), applicability (medium, 5%), and editorial independence (medium, 8%). In conclusion, the methodological quality of CPGs implemented by the MINSA is low. Consequently, its use could not be recommended. The implementation of the methodology for the development of CPGs described in the recentlypublished CPG methodological preparation manual in Peru is a pressing need.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-12-13
Issue
Section
Brief Report
How to Cite
1.
Canelo-Aybar C, Balbin G, Perez-Gomez Ángela, Florez ID. Clinical practice guidelines in Peru: evaluation of its quality using the AGREE II instrument. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 13 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];33(4):732-8. Available from: https://rpmesp.ins.gob.pe/index.php/rpmesp/article/view/2559